News & Insights · Our Standards
How This Site Reads the Sky: Our Editorial Approach to Astrology News
A site that writes about eclipses, transits and festivals owes its readers a statement of method — because this field's public square is crowded with manufactured panic, invented dates and predictions no classical text would sign. This page is that statement: the standards every news and insight article here is written under, reviewed against, and corrected by. Consider it the desk's rules, published.
Astronomy first, verified
Every empirical claim on this site's news pages — an eclipse's date, path and visibility, a transit's timing, a festival's tithi — is checked against modern ephemerides and authoritative astronomical sources before publication, and our own chart work runs on Swiss-precision ephemeris computation under the standard Lahiri ayanamsha. Where the calendar's traditions can legitimately differ — tithi rules that shift an observance by a day, regional panchang rulings — we say so rather than flattening the difference. Where a future date carries genuine uncertainty (a 2027 festival's exact civil day, an eclipse's city-by-city visibility), the page states the uncertainty and tells you the one-line check that resolves it nearer the time. Precision honestly bounded beats confidence invented.
Classical method, clearly labelled
Our interpretive frame is classical Jyotish — the houses, dashas, transits and samhita traditions as the texts give them — and we keep two disciplines around it. First, interpretation is labelled as interpretation: an eclipse's date is a fact; its mundane meaning is a reading, and our pages keep the two visibly distinct. Second, claims stay inside the method's warrant: transit pages describe what the tradition classically assigns and how personal charts modify it; they do not predict elections, markets or calamities to the date, because — as our mundane astrology explainer argues from inside the tradition — the honest method does not support that precision. Where scholars dispute a doctrine's antiquity (Kaal Sarp's absence from the core classics, for instance), the reader is told.
The no-fear policy
This is the house rule that overrides every traffic incentive: no content on this site is designed to frighten you. No doom headlines before eclipses; no 'these three rashis must beware' listicles; no remedy sold on a manufactured emergency. The policy has classical grounding — the texts prescribe shanti, literally pacification, and a tradition whose remedies exist to calm has no business retailing panic — and it has a practical test you can apply to any astrology content anywhere: does this page explain its logic, or does it only escalate your anxiety toward a purchase? Our festival pages tell you when Sutak does not apply; our dosha pages lead with cancellations; our transit pages calibrate rather than alarm. Fear is the counterfeit currency of this field, and this desk does not accept it.
Review, corrections, and what we are for
Every news and insight page is written or reviewed under Dr. R.P. Sharma's editorial responsibility — four and a half decades of classical practice serving as the final filter — and our wider commitments (sourcing, independence, the consultation's flat-fee ethics) are published in the site-wide editorial standards. Corrections are made plainly when an error is found: the page is fixed and its dateModified updated, because a calendar site that cannot admit a wrong date cannot be trusted with a right one. And the purpose behind all of it, stated once: this news section exists so that the sky's actual calendar — transits, eclipses, festivals, the year's real structure — reaches you accurately and calmly, as context for the reading that genuinely guides a life: your own chart, read personally and honestly. Everything else is commentary, and we try to keep the commentary clean.
Frequently asked questions
Who reviews the content on this site?
All astrology news and insight pages are written or reviewed under the editorial responsibility of Dr. R.P. Sharma, practising classical Jyotish since 1979, with empirical claims checked against modern ephemerides and authoritative astronomical sources before publication.
Why doesn't this site publish eclipse warnings for zodiac signs?
Because the classical method does not support dated, sign-by-sign calamity warnings, and our no-fear policy prohibits manufacturing panic. Our eclipse pages give verified dates, visibility, the applicable observances — including when Sutak does not apply — and calibrated classical readings.
How are errors corrected?
Plainly: the page is fixed, its dateModified is updated, and materially significant corrections are noted. A site built on calendrical precision must be more willing than most to admit and repair a wrong date or claim.
What is the difference between fact and interpretation here?
Dates, paths, visibility and timings are facts, verified astronomically. Meanings — what a transit or eclipse classically signifies — are interpretations, labelled as such and kept within what the Jyotish tradition genuinely warrants. Our pages keep the two visibly distinct.
Continue exploring: the site-wide editorial standards, or why world-prediction demands humility.
Standards you can test: read any page here against them — then bring your real questions to Dr. R.P. Sharma — one flat, all-inclusive fee of ₹5,100. WhatsApp✦ Book Now
See also: 28 August 2026 Grahan Time In India.
Where can I learn more or ask about news editorial approach?
Generate your free kundli and PDF report on this site, then consult Dr. R.P. Sharma (flat Rs 5,100, phone/WhatsApp/video) for a personal reading on news editorial approach.
Related Deep Guides
Get your complete picture — free kundli with a 90-page PDF, then a personal reading: Free Kundli + 90-page PDF · Online Astrology Consultation · Consultation Fees